“Purposefully Vague” or Problematic? Why Lawyers Must Define the Duty of Tech Competence

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Ashley Arrington

Vol.20(1), p.218

2024

Abstract

Law and Technology

Legal Technology

Technology Competency

Legal Technology Competency

Law

Legal Education

Legal Profession

Technology

Technology Assessment

Technology Education

Technology Planning or Policy

pdf

“Purposefully Vague” or Problematic? Why Lawyers Must Define the Duty of Tech Competence208.56 kBDownload View

Open Access

3 File views/ downloads

6 Record Views

Title: “Purposefully Vague” or Problematic? Why Lawyers Must Define the Duty of Tech Competence
Author/Creator: Ashley Arrington
Publication Details: Vol.20(1), p.218
Academic Unit: University of St. Thomas Law Journal
Resource Type: Journal article
Preferred Citation: Ashley Arrington, “Purposefully Vague” or Problematic? Why Lawyers Must De5ne the Duty of Tech Competence, 20 U. St. Thomas L.J. 218 (2024).
Journal Volume: Volume 20
Record Identifier: 991015177198703691