Abstract
Geosynthetics, mainly geogrids and geotextiles, are commonly used to mechanically stabilize unbound aggregate layers in paved road applications. They provide lateral restraint to aggregates to initially increase the layer modulus during construction and minimize its time-dependent decrease under vehicular traffic loading. Different types of geosynthetics may provide different improvement mechanisms and stiffness enhancement levels. Quantitative evaluation of various stabilization geosynthetics is presented herein to compare modulus improvement trends and help incorporate geosynthetic benefits into state-of-the-art mechanistic-empirical (M-E) pavement design procedures. Five geogrids (three extruded, one woven, and one welded) and two geotextiles (one woven and one nonwoven) were studied with a dense graded aggregate in laboratory triaxial testing. Geosynthetics were placed at specimen mid-height and three pairs of Bender Element (BE) sensors were placed at various heights above the geosynthetic to collect shear waves and quantify the degree of mechanical stabilization during resilient modulus testing. While resilient moduli did not distinguish effectiveness of different geosynthetics, shear wave measurements could clearly show local stiffness increases achieved with geosynthetic inclusions. Meanwhile, trends observed in shear modulus profiles at various distances from the geosynthetic, when compared to that of control specimen, properly established the modulus enhancement level achieved in mechanical stabilization with geosynthetics.