Abstract
In predicting failure of a material, small scale material properties are critical, and yet small scale random heterogeneities are difficult to characterize accurately and efficiently. In building fracture models, work has focused on statistical characterization of local random microstructure at small to intermediate scales (termed micro- or mesoscale). Many materials can be characterized as effectively isotropic and homogeneous at a large scale. In contrast, at a micro- or mesoscale, Statistical Volume Elements (SVE) often show significant anisotropy and heterogeneity. Characterizing the properties of SVE presents challenges because modeling choices, such as the length scale, boundary conditions applied, and boundary shape chosen, may introduce modeling bias.
Modeling bias must be separated from the actual prediction of anisotropic and heterogeneous characteristics at the SVE level, in order to provide an accurate basis for fracture simulation. Much literature has been devoted to characterizing the size of an RVE in order to effectively homogenize a material, however, there is less study of the effective isotropic limit. The representative size may be different when approaching the homogeneous limit or the isotropic limit.
In this work, elastic and strength properties will be evaluated at multiple scales using SVE with square and circular (so-called “regular”) geometry. A Voronoi tessellation based geometry, where aggregation of Voronoi cells is achieved using square or circular grids, is studied and compared with regular partitioning methods. Models will be tested on two types of microstructures, one that is isotropic at the macroscale, and one which contains a slight directional bias. Results for different SVE geometries will be compared to demonstrate how SVE modeling choices affect the characterization of anisotropy and heterogeneity at the micro- and mesoscale.
•Statistical Volume Elements (SVE) are generated using different edge geometries•SVE elastic and material strength properties are evaluated at multiple scales•SVE edge geometry affects characterization of anisotropy and heterogeneity•Circular SVE edge geometry is preferable to square geometry for capturing anisotropy•SVE boundaries that avoid phase intersections improve modeling accuracy.