Logo image
Resisting Triple Oppression and Superexploitation: Subjectivity of Black Women Workers in Native Son and “How ‘Bigger’ Was Born”
Thesis

Resisting Triple Oppression and Superexploitation: Subjectivity of Black Women Workers in Native Son and “How ‘Bigger’ Was Born”

Tika Jones
Master of Arts in English (MA), University of St. Thomas
2024

Abstract

Richard Wright Native Son How 'Bigger' Was Born
Richard Wright’s depiction of Black women in Native Son has stirred discussion since its publication in 1940, and Wright defends Native Son in his essay, “How ‘Bigger’ Was Born.” This essay explores the subjectivity of Wright’s Black women characters, Mrs. Thomas and Bessie, and how their position in the novel emphasizes superexploitation and triple oppression (race, gender, class) within the modern capitalist system. Wright limits their revolutionary potential by portraying the women as burdens to Bigger, and in the most extreme case, results in perpetual violence against Bigger’s girlfriend, Bessie. Though Wright explores triple oppression inadvertently in Native Son, his essay, “How ‘Bigger’ Was Born,” excludes gender and omits sexism and misogyny as autonomous forces aiding the expansion of national and global capitalism. Women are excluded from Wright’s essay, and this gap is examined in this essay through an en-gendering framework and a racial capitalism framework that interrogates political and social economies impacting Bessie and Mrs. Thomas. These frameworks highlight hierarchical apparatuses that determine and maintain modern capitalist consistencies.
pdf
Essay242.18 kB
Restricted Access, please sign in using your UST login for access.

Metrics

5 File views/ downloads
53 Record Views

Details

Logo image